CryptaCount
EN
EnglishENDeutschDEEspañolESFrançaisFRItalianoIT日本語JA한국어KONederlandsNLPolskiPLPortuguêsPT
Log in Start Free

AFM Integrates AMLA Eligibility Reporting Into Existing Questionnaires

CryptaCount Editorial · · 6 min read
AML / KYC / LICENSING AFM Integrates AMLA EligibilityReporting Into Existing Questionnaires

Dutch-supervised financial firms will not need to complete a separate AMLA reporting template. The Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) confirmed on 13 May 2026 that the eligibility criteria published by the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) have been folded into the AFM's standard supervisory questionnaires, keeping the administrative burden as low as possible while meeting the EU requirement in full.

What AMLA Published and Why It Matters

The eligibility reporting package

On 12 May 2026, AMLA released its final eligibility reporting package. The package sets out the criteria AMLA will use to identify which financial institutions could fall under its direct supervisory remit. This is a significant step: once AMLA begins exercising direct supervision, selected firms will report to the EU-level authority rather than solely to their national regulator.

The data gathered through this process feeds directly into AMLA's selection methodology. Firms deemed "eligible" under those criteria become candidates for direct AMLA oversight, making accurate and timely reporting a material compliance obligation, not an administrative formality.

AMLA's supporting webinar

AMLA has also announced a webinar on 10 June 2026 to walk firms through the eligibility reporting package. The AFM has drawn attention to this event in its own guidance, signalling that firms wishing to understand the full AMLA framework should register directly through AMLA's channels.

The AFM's Approach: Integration, Not Addition

How the criteria are being collected in the Netherlands

Rather than distribute a parallel AMLA-formatted questionnaire, the AFM has embedded the relevant eligibility questions within the regular supervisory questionnaires it already sends to firms under its supervision. The AFM's stated objective is to implement the EU anti-money-laundering package with the least possible additional reporting load on institutions, while still satisfying the European requirements.

For most firms currently receiving AFM questionnaires, this means the AMLA eligibility data collection is already underway or will be captured through the normal supervisory cycle. No separate action is needed to respond to the AMLA template specifically.

The one category that will receive additional questions

There is a defined exception. Managers of investment institutions and UCITS managers will receive supplementary questions from the AFM in June or July 2026. These questions are specifically designed to capture the eligibility data relevant to that sub-sector. The AFM has been explicit that answering these questions is important: the data supports a smooth transition to the future AMLA supervisory model, so non-response or incomplete responses could complicate a firm's standing in that process.

Practical Implications for Compliance and Reporting Teams

Checking your data trails now

Because the eligibility criteria are embedded in existing questionnaires, firms need to be confident that the data feeding those questionnaires is accurate and current. This is where robust digital asset accounting software and crypto bookkeeping software become directly relevant: if a firm's transaction records, counterparty data, or AML indicators are incomplete or poorly structured, the answers submitted through the AFM's questionnaire may not reflect the firm's actual risk profile.

Teams that rely on crypto accounting software to aggregate and classify digital asset activity should verify that their data pipelines capture all reportable information. Gaps at the data layer translate into gaps in supervisory submissions, which carry regulatory consequences as AMLA's oversight role expands.

Investment institution and UCITS managers: act before June

Managers of investment institutions and UCITS managers should begin gathering the information they expect the AFM to request in June or July. The AFM has not specified the exact question set in advance, but the AMLA eligibility reporting package itself provides a detailed indication of the criteria involved. Reviewing that package now allows compliance teams to identify any data gaps before the questions arrive.

For context on the broader EU framework these firms are operating within, the AFM online interface obligations for crypto service providers illustrates how the AFM has been progressively aligning Dutch supervisory practice with EU-level requirements across multiple regulatory instruments.

The AMLA direct supervision horizon

The eligibility process is not an end in itself. It determines which firms AMLA will supervise directly once it becomes fully operational. Firms that are selected will face a more demanding reporting environment: AMLA operates at a different scale and with different expectations than a national regulator. Early attention to data quality and completeness is not only a current compliance obligation but a preparation step for that future relationship.

The EU's broader push on CASP authorization under MiCA runs in parallel. Firms navigating both tracks should note that the MiCA CASP authorization deadline and what it means for EU firms carries its own July 2026 milestone, and the two timelines overlap for many institutions operating in Dutch and wider EU markets.

Key Takeaways for Accounting Firms and CFOs

What to do and what to stop worrying about

For accounting firms advising Dutch-supervised clients, the AFM's message simplifies the immediate landscape. There is no AMLA-template submission to prepare, no parallel reporting channel to stand up, and no new filing deadline that differs from the existing AFM questionnaire schedule. The workload has not increased in that specific respect.

What has increased is the strategic importance of the data within those questionnaires. If the AFM uses questionnaire responses to feed AMLA's eligibility determination, accuracy and completeness become more consequential than in a routine supervisory cycle. Advisers should treat this as a prompt to review whether clients' AML data, transaction records, and counterparty classification are fit for purpose at the AMLA eligibility standard, not just the national one.

For CFOs at firms within scope, the message is similar: confirm that your compliance team is tracking AMLA's 10 June webinar and review whether your firm falls into the investment institution or UCITS manager category, since that is the only group facing an additional AFM touchpoint in the coming months.

Source: Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)

Q: Does my firm need to submit a separate AMLA eligibility template to the AFM?

For most firms under AFM supervision, no. The AFM has embedded the AMLA eligibility questions into its existing questionnaires. The only exception is managers of investment institutions and UCITS managers, who will receive supplementary questions from the AFM in June or July 2026.

Q: What is the AMLA eligibility reporting package and what does it determine?

AMLA published the package on 12 May 2026. It sets out the criteria used to identify which financial institutions could come under AMLA's direct supervision. Firms deemed eligible through this process become candidates for direct EU-level oversight rather than oversight solely by their national regulator.

Q: Why should investment institution and UCITS managers act before June 2026?

The AFM has confirmed this sub-sector will receive additional eligibility questions in June or July 2026. Responding accurately contributes to a smooth transition to AMLA's supervisory model. Firms in this category should review the AMLA eligibility reporting package now to identify any data gaps before those questions arrive.

Q: How does this affect firms using crypto accounting software or digital asset accounting software?

Because the eligibility data is captured through existing supervisory questionnaires, the accuracy of those submissions depends on the quality of underlying records. Firms relying on crypto bookkeeping software to manage digital asset data should verify that transaction records, counterparty information, and AML-related indicators are complete and correctly classified before the questionnaire cycle concludes.

Q: Where can firms learn more about the AMLA eligibility criteria directly?

AMLA is hosting a webinar on 10 June 2026 covering the eligibility reporting package. The AFM's 13 May 2026 guidance directs firms to AMLA's own press release for registration details. Firms should monitor AMLA's official channels for the link.

NLEUGeneralEffectiveAML/KYC & Licensing

Related articles

AML/KYC & Licensing
ESMA MiCA Register Update: 37 New CASPs Approved Post-Deadline
AML/KYC & Licensing
MiCA CASP Authorization: Germany Leads the EU Race as July 1 Deadline Arrives
AML/KYC & Licensing
AFM DMFSD Online Interface Requirements: What Crypto Service Providers Must Do Now
AML/KYC & Licensing
MiCA Transitional Period Expires July 1 2026: CASP Authorization Is Now Mandatory